The setup was good. Both plasmas were running the same program loop.
Identical plasma sets, the left one supposedly running 1080p, the right one
should be running a progressive DVD signal, right? WRONG! Upon close
inspection, the regular DVD image looked worse
than it should, the Blu-Ray looked better. When I questioned a rep, he said
that they didn’t have any 1080p content material, so the Blu-Ray was showing
1080i, and the regular DVD was showing 480i video scaled up to 1080i within
the plasma. That’s why I saw all sorts of ringing and less detail than I
should have had the right side set been fed a 480p signal. Try again next
year Pioneer!
Here’s some shots of the Blu-Ray booth:
My current impression of Blu-Ray
and HD-DVD? It’s great, but no one except the highest quality
display devices will realize a lot of
benefit from it. Any of the older digital projectors and CRT projectors
8” or less do not have the display capacity of true 1080p, so my advice
is to ignore the hype and wait until the
format war of Blu Ray and HD-DVD has settled down. I heard pricing of
$500-1800 USD for current Blu-Ray players. I personally am using 720p
with a good scaler on a 9” CRT, and I love it.
Sony Ruby- One item that I do not have
pictures of is the new Sony Ruby. This is an SXRD (Silicon X-tal
Reflective Display) device that is an LCD-DLP
hybrid (called LCOS: Liquid Crystal on Silicon) that promised to outperform all other digital projection devices.
I expected Sony to have a large display at
their booth of it, so you can imagine my disappointment when the Ruby
was there, but it was not set up. I was however told that the Sony Store
at Caesar’s Palace had it on display.
So of course I went cruising over to the Sony
Store. At Caesar’s it is not called the Sony Store, it’s called ‘Sony
Style’. I walked into the back of the store and asked to see the Ruby. I
was led into a back room, where the sale guy had to call a second sales
guy to get it to turn on. I was also told that it was installed 3 days
earlier. I inquired as to whether it was ISF
calibrated, and then I had to explain what ISF calibration was. So I
guess it wasn’t calibrated... :)
Upon sitting down on the couch, I noticed that the
projector was mounted a good 12” off to one side of the middle of the
screen. Not a good start. Overall, the image on this unit was
underwhelming to say the least. It was being fed
with a 480p component signal from a DVD player, not the best
source for this high end set. The color was good, but the brightness was
low. I had read that this was not a high output projector like the far
more expensive Qualia, but this was only about 800 lumens to me.
It was very obvious that this projector was poorly
set up, in fact the sales guy did tell me
that it was not tweaked at all. However, he also said that the poor
picture was due to the low resolution SCREEN, which of course was
a blatant untruth. I hope to see a well set up Ruby somewhere here
locally so I can really evaluate it. I believe that the Ruby is the best
of the digital technologies out there, but I didn’t see that from the
Sony Style in Vegas. Note that the far more expensive Sony Qualia was
set up right next door to the Ruby, and it looked great… but with no
true black levels as I’d seen before.
Conclusions about CES display technology
From what I saw this year at CES (and yes, I missed
a number of show items that I really SHOULD have looked at, like the new
Toshiba display technology), all digital displays have come a long way
from what they were a few years ago. The WOW factor of a good looking
flat screen or an image from a 10 lb box is very
high.
HOWEVER… all digital units are STILL designed to be
disposable. Repairs are exceptionally pricy out of warranty, bulb costs
for units that require them are expensive, and these units are not
designed for long life spans. View any of these units before you buy,
the picture quality does vary from set to set, and what looks good on a
spec sheet might look bad in person.
On lower end units, extreme white and black details
suffer. Many low end displays (and some high end ones) looked like
actor’s faces had a layer of oil sheen on them, as if they were about to
break out in a bad case of acne. Many white area details, like folds or
creases in a white shirt were smeared, and all detail was thus lost.
To me, CRT still give
the best bang for the buck, and has the lowest cost per hour of run
time. Complete modular construction, lots of parts and modules
available for them and no pesky expensive bulbs to replace make them the
best deal out there. But you knew that already, right? :)
1080p right now is overrated. There is no question
that a true 1080p signal source will give more details to the image, but
considering that only the top of the line CRT projectors and the current
digital display devices allow the full resolution that 1080p sources put
out, it’s best to hold off on the purchase of these devices for a few
more years.